<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AREVA North America: Next Energy Blog &#187; United Kingdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://us.arevablog.com/tag/united-kingdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://us.arevablog.com</link>
	<description>Next Energy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UK Invests in Nuclear Power as CO2-Free Solution</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/11/uk-invests-in-nuclear-power-as-co2-free-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/11/uk-invests-in-nuclear-power-as-co2-free-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AREVA North America Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA EPR Reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Miliband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho Samizdat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news out of the United Kingdom on Monday was that they&#8217;re going to be giving the go-ahead to start the process of building 10 new nuclear power plants in England and Wales.  According to the BBC, most of the new plants will be built on sites where there are already nuclear power plants in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/11/uk-invests-in-nuclear-power-as-co2-free-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AREVA Clarifies Communication from European Regulatory Agencies on EPR™ Reactor</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/02/areva-clarifies-communication-from-european-regulatory-agencies-on-epr%e2%84%a2-reactor/</link>
		<comments>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/02/areva-clarifies-communication-from-european-regulatory-agencies-on-epr%e2%84%a2-reactor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AREVA North America Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA EPR Reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OL3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olkiluoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=1217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nuclear safety authorities in Finland, France and the United Kingdom have raised common questions regarding the respective I&#038;C (instrumentation and control) certifications for the EPR™ reactor in each country. AREVA pointed out in a statement today that the authorities have not called into question the safety of the EPR™ reactor.
This constant dialog between operators, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/02/areva-clarifies-communication-from-european-regulatory-agencies-on-epr%e2%84%a2-reactor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Energy: Way More than Carbon Neutral</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/09/29/nuclear-energy-way-more-than-carbon-neutral/</link>
		<comments>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/09/29/nuclear-energy-way-more-than-carbon-neutral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AREVA North America Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA EPR Reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA M5000 Multibrid Wind Turbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Energy Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jarret Adams
Antinuclear activists lately have been trotting out that old chestnut that nuclear energy is not really CO2-free and that this claim is some type of deception. Here’s the short version: nuclear power plants do not produce CO2 while they are producing electricity. For each new AREVA EPR™ reactor that we build, we can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/09/29/nuclear-energy-way-more-than-carbon-neutral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Actually, Nuclear Energy is Cost Competitive</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/07/16/yes-actually-nuclear-energy-is-cost-competitive/</link>
		<comments>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/07/16/yes-actually-nuclear-energy-is-cost-competitive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Berezowskyj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AREVA North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Toronto Star article presented some misleading figures about cost competitiveness of nuclear energy, in regards to the bid in progress for two new reactors. This also made it to the Climate Progress Blog—so we figured that we should &#8220;clear the air,&#8221; because this is something the nuclear energy industry is already very good [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/07/16/yes-actually-nuclear-energy-is-cost-competitive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
