June 8th, 2011 | 11:52 am

Momentum Builds for AREVA U.S. Recycling Effort

Interest is growing for the development of recycling in the United States, AREVA Inc. CEO Jacques Besnainou told a roomful of reporters yesterday at a breakfast sponsored by the Energy Daily in Washington, D.C. Besnainou said that talks with U.S. utilities have “accelerated” during the past few months regarding the possibility of developing a U.S. recycling plant, as mentioned in an Energy Daily article.

As a similar account by Reuters noted, Besnainou said he is hopeful that AREVA can begin planning development of a recycling facility as early as 2015. The article added that:

Besnainou said a recycling center would be preferable to developing interim storage sites, such as those being considered by the Obama administration’s Blue Ribbon commission on nuclear waste.

“When you do a recycling center, you’re being part of the solution. You’re taking care of the fuel, you’re making the fuel less dangerous,” Besnainou said. “Interim storage is kicking the can down the road.”

Draft recommendations from the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, formed to address America’s nuclear waste management strategy, have called for one or more interim storage facilities where used fuel could be stored safely for decades. While AREVA supports the commission’s draft recommendations in general, Besnainou noted that developing recycling as part of a comprehensive approach represents a better long-term solution.

He added that AREVA also is very supportive of the panel’s recommendation to create a Federal Corporation (Fed Corp), similar to the Tennessee Valley Authority, to implement America’s used nuclear fuel strategy.

Besnainou concluded that building a recycling facility would enable the United States to safely delay the opening of a permanent repository for at least 50 years. The administration decided to stop funding the Yucca Mountain repository project in 2009. A Bloomberg article noted that AREVA already recycles used fuel for customers in Europe. It added:

The U.S. [recycling] facility, which may be operating by 2025, would create thousands of jobs in the community where it is built, Besnainou said.

Host communities would be more supportive of an interim storage facility if it were accompanied by a “pilot” recycling plant, Besnainou said. As reported in a Dow Jones article, he added that “communities would compete to host a recycling operation because it would mean more jobs and investment than a fuel storage facility.”

AREVA last month issued a comprehensive white paper detailing the company’s vision for developing recycling in the United States and the benefits of this technology.


  • JJRaleigh

    What the administration is doing to the Yucca Mountain Project is completely corrupt!!! 
     
    Dirty Harry “The War is Lost” Reid planted Gregory Jaczko (his former Science Advisor and he also worked for anti-nuke Ed Markey) on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (after holding up ~100 Bush appointees until Bush was forced to cave) and then pushed for him to be the Chairman of the NRC under Obama SPECIFICALLY so he could derail the NRC Review of the YMP License Application from the inside. 
     
    In addition, he got Steven Chu to flip-flop his position on the YMP (after signing with the other National Lab Leads that the YMR was the path to pursue) in order to gain appointment to the Secretary of Energy job (… So much for “Sound Science”…).  Further, the sitting NRC Commissioners all had to agree not to challenge DOE’s pulling of the License Application during their confirmation hearings in order to be confirmed. 
     
    All of these players and obstructionists are in violation of the LAW!!!  Reid, Waxman, Jaczko, Chu, Berkley, Heller ALL need to be thrown out of their jobs…  I’d even go further and have them arrested for violating FEDERAL LAW.
     
    Further, the ongoing BRC effort is just one big stall tactic!!!  Otherwise, the BRC members would have been permitted to include the Yucca Mountain Repository in their evaluation.  I also do not buy into the allegation that the people of Nevada do not want the repository.  Informal polls show 70 percent of Nevadans to be in favor of the state negotiating with the federal government to ascertain our safety concerns and determine what benefits might be available.
     
    The NRC needs to be forced to release an unredacted version of the Post-Closure Safety Evaluation Report (SER Vol. 3) to the public so the people know what is going on…   BTW — Ask yourself this:  Why would a redacted version of the Safety Evaluation Report be issued if it agreed with Harry Reid’s position???   It wouldn’t!!!!  If the NRC’s safety determination supported this administration’s desire to shutdown the Yucca Mountain Project, they would be beating that drum like crazy!!!