<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Support – Yes, Saskatchewan has it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/03/public-support-%e2%80%93-yes-saskatchewan-has-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/03/public-support-%e2%80%93-yes-saskatchewan-has-it/</link>
	<description>Next Energy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alun Richards</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/03/public-support-%e2%80%93-yes-saskatchewan-has-it/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Alun Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=1207#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Here are the questions from the poll:

Question:
Would you say you are strongly supportive, somewhat supportive, somewhat unsupportive or not supportive at all of the continuation of uranium mining in Saskatchewan?

Answer:

The large majority of Saskatchewan residents (74%) continue to exhibit high levels of support for the uranium mining industry in Saskatchewan – including more than a third (36%) who are ‘strongly supportive’ of the industry.

While support levels remain high, the spring 2009 survey shows a decline in support from the 80 percent-plus level of recent years.

Question:
Do you strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or strongly disagree that Saskatchewan should consider building a nuclear reactor to generate electricity?

Answer:
The majority of residents (63%) continue to think the province should consider building a nuclear reactor to generate electricity. The level of support has dropped somewhat as recent developments have moved the issue from a vague possibility to a more tangible reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the questions from the poll:</p>
<p>Question:<br />
Would you say you are strongly supportive, somewhat supportive, somewhat unsupportive or not supportive at all of the continuation of uranium mining in Saskatchewan?</p>
<p>Answer:</p>
<p>The large majority of Saskatchewan residents (74%) continue to exhibit high levels of support for the uranium mining industry in Saskatchewan – including more than a third (36%) who are ‘strongly supportive’ of the industry.</p>
<p>While support levels remain high, the spring 2009 survey shows a decline in support from the 80 percent-plus level of recent years.</p>
<p>Question:<br />
Do you strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or strongly disagree that Saskatchewan should consider building a nuclear reactor to generate electricity?</p>
<p>Answer:<br />
The majority of residents (63%) continue to think the province should consider building a nuclear reactor to generate electricity. The level of support has dropped somewhat as recent developments have moved the issue from a vague possibility to a more tangible reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crf</title>
		<link>http://us.arevablog.com/2009/11/03/public-support-%e2%80%93-yes-saskatchewan-has-it/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>crf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.arevablog.com/?p=1207#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Will you post your poll&#039;s questions, verbatim?

It&#039;s the only honest way of citing polls, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you post your poll&#8217;s questions, verbatim?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the only honest way of citing polls, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
